karinhodginjones's posterous

Occupy frustration

Since the beginnings of the Occupy Movement, I've been participating with the occupiers in various actions, visiting the encampments of many Occupy groups & video documenting those actions.  During this time, I've been conflicted on many fronts.

1. As a documentarian, I've struggled with my goal to be impartial in documenting the reality of the successes and failures of the occupy movement with the fact that I am fully in support of the focused message of the Occupy movement.  (Eliminating the extraordinary corporate influence in politics, raise a national conversation, with the goal of affecting change, about the rapidly growing wealth gap and diminished capacity for class mobility in the U.S. and making changes to the structure of influence so that the elected officials represent the needs and wishes of the people who elect them.)

2. As I have been increasingly present at one occupy camp in my own community more, I see the problem of conflicting goals among occupiers. I often disagree on methodology and justification for certain actions or proposed actions.  I have also seen an increasing protectionism about information and inclusion. I was recently asked if I was a "cop" by someone who may or may not consider themself a part of the occupy group but who demanded that I Mic Check the camp & tell them who I am and what I'm about to allay fears (they felt some may have) that any outsider is an "infiltrator".  While this is an isolated experience, things which challenge my beliefs, ethics and understanding of the underlying goals of inclusion & direct democracy have arisen more and more in recent visits to encampments.

3. There are divisions which seem to be only further strengthening instead of healing. One such division is the claimed continuation of inclusion while simultaneously disavowing any member of the group who takes autonomous action. In an effort to undermine the various Occupy Encampments, any crime or suspect activity that occurs within a mile of the camps is usually inaccurately attributed to the Occupy groups by various media outlets. The various forms of media that are covering the camps from the perspective of a visitor or who do not visit the sites create associations and suspicions that are usually unfounded. When the group must clarify these inaccurate messages from the media, when individual members attempt to provide accurate information online or, generally, when many voices of the occupiers rise up to cry foul, it creates the image of a fracture or an identity crisis.  This works against the goal of being justly portrayed that the occupiers request from the media groups that cover their activities. It is a frustration that I have seen little means of avoiding. Some within the group feel that ignoring the media is the best method forward. However, for would-be supporters, media coverage is often the only information that is available and the reports of abuses, violence or the fear of being asked to participate in violent activities is enough to steer them away from donating money, time or resources to the movement.

4. There tends to be a vacuum of information for those who wish to know more or must travel a distance to attend actions or events at the camp nearest me. Because it takes an hour on the train and at least $6 / day to travel into the city to participate, I have to plan to be there for several hours and find that I'm unable to participate in many actions that are kept quite secret until just before their execution.  Being a working artist who is otherwise unemployed, I attempt to balance my time between applying for exhibition opportunitities, applying for jobs, participating with the Occupy group in my area and also caring for my (employed) husband and our home. Currently, the place where I would seek information about teach-ins, meetings or events I would like to attend is having a server error. I might even be able to assist with the management of the website if I could find any resources to discover who to contact or what it is that they need.  I even have 10GB of extra storage space on my own website that could be donated, if only I could find out who to ask, where to go, what is needed.

5. Suspicion abounds. Is this just a feature of a leaderless and inclusive movement? I fear not. Those who live in the encampment certainly have learned the people who share their space. They recognize who contributes and who doesn't. They recognize who continually engage in actions that endanger the safety of themselves or others, who promotes aggression or demonstrates neglect for the goals of the Occupy Movement writ large. Because this is visible to so many at the heart of the movement, it is confusing why the conflict is not addressed and resolved. It is confusing why information shuts down, rather than increasing transparency so that those who would have ulterior motives would find themselves engaged in conversation regularly about their goals. Instead, these things are treated like they should only be discussed in confidence and not shared on the internet, or anywhere where the media or those who would seek to undermine the movement could attach to any problems and spin them into hysterical anti-ows attacks.

 

In each of these cases listed above, I feel simply that these are the same problems and justifications for exclusion, information withholding & deferred conversation about structural problems that are used by the existing power structure of our government and corporations. This is deeply disheartening to those who would do more but find themselves isolated and discluded.

Where in the encampments is there a productive dialogue about issues that create the replication of the systems that the movement seeks to replace?  Where is there an appropriate self-consciousness about our tendency to use the tools at hand (for example responding in those ways previously modeled through non-productive systems like our current government and corporations) when it becomes difficult to create new tools for new solutions?  I have held out much hope that there would be a challenging growth period during which we as occupiers make many of the mistakes of our history but ultimately find ourselves laughing and gaining perspective when we look inside and see how challenging it is to create real change that begins from within. That with this new found perspective, we would be able to do something that the government and corporations fear most. Slow down and reflect. Help to further include, to learn and to educate so that we don't, for the sake of expediency, run rough-shod through our chance to change the world.  I've been talking and thinking and hoping about the successful passing of this hurdle on the path to creating something truly different and what's more, truly functional for over a month now. Today I find myself returning to these questions and wondering how to reinvest, encourage and include everyone while asking my set of questions. 

And for the guy who wanted proof I'm not a cop, wanted me to mic check the whole camp to tell them I'm not a cop, I say google me. All of my names are here on this site. You can learn almost everything about me, check the way-back machine and see that there are websites referencing me from the 90's. But remember, if anyone is a "cop", they've thought of all of this and they would be at the center of the action, especially the most controversial and dangerous action. Will suspicion help? Will suspicion of everyone who comes to camp yield productive, open, inclusive dialogue? Will the posting of "how to spot agent provacateurs" signs make those agents reveal or remove themselves? Or will you make those would-be participants passing through, visiting for the first time who are innundated with images and behaviors demonstrating suspicion, secrecy and fear feel concerned about the direction of this movment?

 

 

Empathy: Rational Arguments for Civilizing the United States of America

I hope this will be a letter of understanding.  I hope you will see what many of us do, that we understand what lies beneath the anger and confusion at our contemporary condition.  I hope you will listen to how some of us see we have arrived at this point.

 

My parent's were born at the beginning of the baby boom.  They are in the first wave of "boomers" to begin to enter their retirement and to draw their social security and to move onto Medicare.  They are conservatives and find themselves in this contemporary society frustrated with their need to accept the social safety nets while simultaneously believing it is these safety nets that are contributing to a collapse of their vision of the United States of America.  To better understand my parent's point of view, I considered where they came from and where they are coming from now.

In the 60's when my parents completed high school, they were trained and prepared to enter the workforce without a need for a college education.  The middle class was growing, tax rates on highest wage earners were pretty high but the state of technology permitted someone with a decent high school education to enter the workforce at an entry level position and make a decent wage.  My father went into a unionized trade and got on-the-job training as a welder.  His employer offered certifications through his work as he progressed in his skill and craft.  My mother worked as a secretary and was offered on-the-job training when new versions of technology were introduced.  Both could expect to remain at their jobs for 20 or more years, paying into a pension and being offered opportunities to advance in the companies as they acquired greater understanding of the business and the skills required to succeed.  They knew they could do this because they saw their parents do much the same thing.  I still remember my maternal grandfather's gold watch he was given upon his retirement for many decades of excellent service to one company, engraved with his name and a thank you from the company for that service.  This was, for my family, an honorable time where in exchange for service, you received fair compensation, were able to save for your retirement and you actually knew the head of the company for which you worked.

In the 1970's my parents had children.  From the beginning of our lives, we were told the importance of education and cousins and other younger members of our community, entering the workforce, were still able to begin at an entry level position and plan to have a life similar to what our parents had.  We were middle-class, we were lucky. 

in the 1980's I began my education in public schools and our middle-class life afforded us the opportunity to attend a school with a small student body and large funds for the classrooms.  In 3rd grade, I took Spanish class and in 4th grade, I took my 1st computer class, learning to program in basic.  Later that year, I took an introduction to electronics course.  My education was already proving to be markedly different from the education my parents had.  Computers were not common in homes, let alone classrooms but the presence of the Apple IIe computers in my 4th grade classroom were a harbinger of the advances of technology that would change education.  By the time I was finishing high school, it was my parents wish that my brothers and I would go to college.  Living and working alongside the growth of technology and through the 80's where technological competitiveness was leading to a rise in quality and importation of products, especially from Japan, as well as the outsourcing of certain types of manufacturing jobs to other countries due to the other country's stronger technological capabilities, my parents saw that the standard public high school education may not provide entry into a new workforce.  Our community experienced an influx of workers who were leaving the rust belt cities as auto-manufacturing jobs were leaving the U.S. and more wealth poured into our community as the Big Three auto manufacturer middle managers took positions at the stronghold Dow Chemical and Eli Lilly companies in our city.  The influx of wealth and the children coming from families of people who had achieved so much with a college education reinforced what they had been telling us.  We, their children's generation, would need more education.  So, my generation went on to college in numbers that far exceeded all previous generations.

In the 80's as my generation was completing college and beginning to compete in the workforce with my parent's generation, we saw the beginnings of the crumbling of their American dream.  Their greatest desire was for their children to have a better life and to be able to find sure footing in a job market made them push us to go to college.  To go further in our study than they did, to have a better start.  Simultaneously, my parents were finding they were suddenly competing with "kids" just slightly older than I was at their jobs.  People coming into the workforce with MBA's and Bachelor's degrees that placed them in the management positions near or even above the perches where my parents had worked diligently to arrive over years of devoted service.  Their dream for their children came to compete with their own ability to pursue their, "from humble beginnings" American Dream.  If they knew it, or if it confused them, I don't recall that they said.  They continued to urge us to go to college, perhaps seeing that it worked!  Younger people were starting with salaries commensurate with their own just because they had college degrees.  They simultaneously expressed their frustration that they had to accept orders or work along side people who had no "life experience" only a degree.  If they didn't hear the dischord of those two positions, I certainly did.  I both felt responsible for participating in what created nearly impossible competition for my parents but also strongly that I would not be able to compete in the job market without a degree.  Difficult waters for all to navigate.

 

In the 90's Outsourcing continued.  Access to more technologically advanced tools for the workplace evened out in various country's markets, however the wages became a much larger issue for companies.  In many ways, the wages my parents had worked so hard to achieve through years of devoted service were compared by the bottom lines of companies struggling to make profits in a global economy where the cost of living in another country was much lower and even a lower wage paid abroad would be a welcome economic boost for those local populations.  With the increase of production abroad, the growth of local economies abroad and the subsequent investments in manufacturing in these growing economies, it became necessary to really revamp our trade agreement policies.  The large American Middle class needed to be able to buy goods for less since, after all, their wages weren't going up and my parents generation found themselves struggling to compete with better educated people in the workforce increasingly comprised of management for multi-national corporations manufacturing oversees. 
Also in the 90's I lived through the major shifts in technology that would forever change our understanding and relationships to other people.  When I began college in 1993, I had to telnet into a server, through a dial-up connection to access my email.  I wasn't able to communicate with people on other campuses, but I could communicate with people in my network that I need never meet.  We talked in "chat rooms" and I was required to check my email for information about my classes.  by the time I left University in 1995, I was able to connect with people across the country who were attending other universities.  The expectation that I would be familiar with and participate in this technology in order to register for classes or to communicate with professors was made explicit.  This was the new means of communication and we were moving to the efficiency of this model.  My generation became excellent typists quickly, produced their research papers on word processors and learned the 15 digit code to name the printer in the computer lab to print out our complete research.  It was an additional learning curve that I know my parents were experiencing in their own jobs.  Having the benefit of a computer in the classroom from age 10, I was not poorly equipped to do this.  However, my father still does not own a computer and never learned to type.

The rapid advance of and, (this is my theory) the push by universities to connect through the internet, led to a massive expansion of the capabilities of the Web.  By the time I went to school for my Bachelor's of Art in the late 90's, there were multiple web browsers available and nearly all correspondence at the university was online.  The industry that was growing most rapidly, pushed by academia and the private corporations for the greater agility of communication across the globe that the internet offered, was in the computer sciences.  Computer based technologies, software, data storage, cables and peripheral devices.  The true competition in the US hovered around the rapid move toward greatest efficiency and portability of these devices.  The manufacturing of these devices moved rapidly away from components easily held in a human hand to pieces so small they must be placed by precision robots left human participation in the physical manufacturing of devices nearly obsolete.  The boost, of course, was that many items still required manufacturing that happened on a more "human" scale and so the ability to make food, tools, auto-parts, heavy equipment and the like were still available to people without advanced education.  So, while the need for more people in manufacturing dwindled, there was still a steady base of manufacturing that didn't hold the promise to shrink in the way the most rapidly growing industries had been. 

At the end of the 90's, we begin to feel the bubble burst.  The rapidity of the growth of the computer science related industries left companies and countries with questions about who owned what?  What is licensing? How do you assess interstate commerce fees?  What constitutes a transaction?  How do you price these goods and services?  Investment was high but understanding of the future of this growth was low.  The dot-com bubble burst and with it, so did much of the value of these companies that had been pushing GDP up and up. 

 

So, back to my parents.  They had their pensions, from decades of devoted service, some stock investments, they owned homes and had stable, if not increasing, incomes.  They were approaching retirement and had seen everything they believed about the American Dream that included the ability to move from humble beginnings toward reward for service shift and mutate throughout their working lives.  The urged their children to do the things they saw brought success to others in their communities even though our successes, in many ways, led to their stagnation.  I begin to see where frustration might set in.

I will not go into the wars, though perhaps the feelings of an older generation about the role of U.S. war-waging around the globe may be the most divisive topic of all, but I will talk about the things that accompanied those wars.  Major recessions.  With the economic downturns we have experienced thus far in the 00's, my parents have been all but wiped out.  Their wages, which hadn't appreciated much relative to cost of living increases, since the 90's due to their lack of advanced educations and the extraoridinary competitiveness of the highly educated workforce produced from my generation, had been enough for them to maintain.  Refinancing their homes allowed them to make further investments in themselves and to improve their lives for a while, though they took on additional debt terms doing it.  They participated in the lead-up to the housing market bubble burst by capitalizing on equity that the markets supported prior to the burst.  They are now undewater for that amount and more after the "pop" and subsequent economic downturn.  They are both at or beyond what had been "retirement age" though neither of them can afford to retire.  Both have been forced, due to health concerns, to enroll in medicare and to begin drawing Social Security in order to keep their homes and make ends meet.  Neither of them can see a time in their future where the Social Security will be enough to live off of and so do not plan to retire until their bodies force retirement upon them.

My parents inability and refusal to retire is a harbinger of a different kind.  A new generation of ultra-educated and ever more specialized people is prepared to enter a workforce in the U.S. that is primarily driven by the computer sciences, advertising, health-care and public service.  The message their parents (people my age, if I had children) would have given them was, you have to get an advanced degree.  Everyone has a bachelor's degree, you need to be better trained and have a specialization these days.  College costs have risen, contributing to major setbacks in retirement planning for many in my generation, causing families to stretch to the limit to educate their children or to take on copious amounts of debt.  All of this in the promise of the New American Dream.  The idea that with this education, you will be able to enter the workforce and begin building upon your expertise immediately.  There will be a minimum of on-the-job training and this will be a benefit to employers!  You'll arrive with the knowledge needed and they can put you to work for them right away.  But, as I said, my parents were on the front edge of the Baby Boom generation.  They are just now in bodily need of retirement but unable, unless forced, to leave the workforce.  Their grandchildren are trying to do what they were told was the right thing to do.  To make themselves the most attractive candidate, filled with knowledge and a hunger to go to work after so many years taking on debt or stretching every dollar for their education.  However, there just aren't enough jobs. 

The Baby Boom generation will continue to move into retirement age for another 10ish years.  Many, like my parents, will have had setbacks through the various economic downturns that prevent them from willingly leaving the workforce.  Young people who have just completed their education and have the debt equivalent to a small home mortgage before the age of 25 are unable to move into the workforce until these jobs are vacated or new jobs are created.  Everyone is stuck.

I understand the bitterness that may come from seeing everything about what you believed was the "right way to live" the honorable way to work and raise a family shift and change throughout your life only to have nearly everything you had worked for stolen away in the market crash of 2008.  You did what you believed was right.  You did your part, you were diligent and loyal.  In exchange for that loyalty, you end your life in struggle instead of enjoying the fruits of honest labor.

However, I also understand my own generation and the generation now preparing to move into the workforce did what they were told and they believed was right.  They invested in themselves, they were too young, unemployed or unprepared, to invest in the markets and yet, they're seeing their own lives wiped out by debt before they ever had the chance to grow fruit from their labors.  I can understand the apathy that accompanies looking forward into a life that shows little promise and the internal struggle for understanding if it was right or wrong to believe in yourself, to make that investment, to take that chance.

In all, we, as a society have arrived at this point together.  With the best of intentions by some and with bad intentions by some.  By and large, we have moved toward what we believed was right, toward investment in our own skills and abilities and a desire to use those skills to benefit our society.  If we are unable to find empathy for one another on hot-button political topics, in our posture regarding war or the role of the U.S. in global politics and military concerns, can we at least recognize in our fellow citizens that for most of us (and I believe nearly ALL of us) we have sought to be good, honorable and to serve our society with the best skills available to us? 

Rational Arguments for Civilizing the United States of America: For Profit Healthcare

Watching Bloomberg business news and seeing that major healthcare providers have seen drops in their stocks due to decreased Medicare Payments.

If the stocks of these companies are only profitable when receiving major payments from medicare and these stocks tumble when the threat of decreased medicare payments is revealed, then these companies are only profitable as long as they are propped up by government money.

Cut out the middle man.  This is a clear, crystal clear example of the reality that the for-profit healthcare industry is against the government public option and not against the government handout.  While the medicare coverage that the individuals receive is earned based on their investment in Medicare over their working lives and the medicare is not a hand-out, there is no denying that the government money going to these companies is a form of corporate welfare.

We must eliminate these leeches that suck PROFITS from our government funds.  Get rid of the middle man, get rid of the profit motive and offer better healthcare with lower costs.

Rational Arguments for civilizing the United States of America: Job Creators and Taxes

The GOP has claimed that the burdensome tax structure levied against U.S. corporations has caused the outsourcing of jobs by U.S. companies and failure of other nations' corporations to invest in the United States work force.  So far, this claim has failed to demonstrate any proof.  With the 5+ years of Bush Era tax cuts as certainty, the net growth of jobs remained in the negative territory and outsourcing has prevailed.  So, it is up to the corporations to answer for this.  Here is a solution that could bring even a left progressive like me around to believing you.

Corporate Jobs Pledge:

If Corporations commit to creating 15 million new jobs in the U.S. in the next 2 years and guarantee that they will not downsize more than 5% over a 10 year period, jobs that provide justified salaries and benefits, we will lower their corporate taxes to virtually nothing for that 10 year period.

Individual tax rates will be brought into reasonable levels relative to income groups and loopholes that unfairly favor the personally wealthy (resulting in a proportion of taxes paid lower than the lowest wage earners in the U.S.) will be eliminated.  If corporations currently tie their business expenses to their personal expenses, they will have expedited assistance with shifting their corporate format to disentangle personal wealth from corporate funds.

It is really quite simple.  Give us a jobs pledge and we make it insanely easy to invest in the U.S.  Barring any such agreement, it is the encumbrance of U.S. citizens to ignore the unproven GOP claims. 

 

 

 

Posted July 26, 2011

Rational Arguments for Civilizing the United States: Infrastructure

While questions of the very constitutionality of the Debt Limit complicates the debates over spending cuts and debt limit increases between the executive and legislative branches, very real state and federal budget affecting issues are raging across the country. Look at the first several headlines in the Bismarck Tribune and you'll see a description of people displaced, students relocated to different institutions and restrictions on the hours of use of roads beginning to emerge from floods. Scan the headlines on KFAB Radio's Website and you'll see descriptions of levee breaches, the ongoing monitoring of Dams taxed by the flooding and water release, calls for sandbagging help and the constant concern of the flooding at the Nuclear Facility at Fort Calhoun in Nebraska. Most of the southern portion of the U.S. is experiencing unusual to exceptional drought conditions according to the U.S. drought monitor and NOAA State of the Climate websites. Along with the moderate to exceptional drought conditions in much of the southern portion of the U.S., NOAA State of the Climate website has comprehensive data into June regarding the record breaking fire events these drought stricken regions have and continue to experience. "During May, there were 6,625 fires which burned approximately 1.1 million acres (0.45 million hectares). This is the most acres burned during the month of May on record, and brings the year-to-date acreage burned to 3.45 million acres (1.4 million hectares), also the largest in the 12-year period of record." from NOAA State of the Climate . The USDA forest service continues to track current wildfires and states stricken by wildfire damage or flood damage continue to declare states of emergency as they battle the elements.
These are the very real conditions facing people displaced from their homes, their livelihoods and their communities throughout the U.S. this spring and early summer. The floods have been so severe that many flooding victims, who did not believe they lived in a flood risk zone, did not have flood insurance. Those displaced by wildfires may have to fully rebuild or consider a permanent move. It has been a very challenging spring and summer for many in the central and southern portions of the U.S. However, the question that must be addressed during this time of major upheaval and elemental alteration of land and human built structures is one of impact assessment and reasoned construction and repair.
Though so much of the debate in the U.S. government this year has focused on cutting discretionary spending and questions of the most effective means of spurring the economy, a prime test case for one proposed strategy has emerged as the elements have receded. Infrastructure investment, public / private partnership and the need for skilled and highly educated labor will be in high demand once the levees, roads, bridges, sewage systems, electrical grids, gas lines and all of the other contributions to sanitation and structure emerge from this elemental alteration of the landscape. Each of these issues has been a political football caught in the budget games of the past year with varying justifications for inclusion or exclusion by the battling teams. However, each can be parsed from this very real series of personal and community crises and evaluated for their merits.

Infrastructure investment: FEMA and State Emergency Management will do some of the front line work in helping to stabilize impacted communities immediately following the elemental events. However, there will need to be a comprehensive evaluation of the structural stability of bridges and roadways that have experienced super-saturation of the supportive ground structures or extended force impact from debris and water pressure. Levees which have failed as well as levees, locks, dams and other water containment infrastructural elements must be assessed and repaired. In the case of a levee failure, the type and quality of earth and other barricade materials will need to be assessed for their ability to recompose as the water that impregnates them begins to flow out of them and they must be assessed and rebuilt to be able withstand future flooding. For all of these endeavors, highly educated and skilled laborers must be employed. The cultural anti-elitism, that has spread to many parts of the country in the past few years, be damned. We need people working on these problems that are at the top of their specialization, who have extensive experience and who have learned the science and history of these problems in order to make best assessments.

Public / Private Partnership: One of the central theses of the recession has been the role of the private markets relative to the role of public or government investment. When considering matters that have no investment return potential, such as fabrication of bridges and electric lines, there is little room for debate that a private company seeking to make a profit will find virtually no long-term profit in the construction and fabrication aspects beyond their installation and completion. In this case, a public / private partnership is a best means of managing the rebuilding efforts. Private firms with expert engineers can receive an appropriate profit only in the planning and construction / completion phases of the work. So, they are designed to do so. Government agencies send out a request for proposals from the best firms to do this work. They accept a bid that is in a reasonable price range and employ the firm to do the assessment, design and/or construction portions of the labor. Private investors, outside of these design firms, have virtually no way to further capitalize on this type of labor. A private investor cannot invest in a Levee and draw further commission from its use. For the private market, there is no long-term accrual, only pure risk. Should a private market invest in a levee and should it fail, they would hold only risk, liability for those impacted and potential lawsuits. There is no place in this type of infrastructural investment for the private investor. The only exception would be the construction of toll or private roads, which may be a small portion of the reconstruction efforts but could not be implemented on a large enough scale in small towns lining rivers and the only points of interstate crossing for the interstate highway system to account for all of the spending and investment that is necessary.

The result of this public / private partnership is the enrichment of private firms receiving money to do the engineering, design, assessment of the labor, perhaps additional firms contracted to do the construction and labor and the stability of the local economies impacted through quality infrastructure permitting travel and commerce. Road construction, bridge construction, interstate highway construction, electrical grid construction, sewer and gas lines are managed by multiple governmental agencies in varying levels of partnership. From local property, city, county and state taxes to federal gas taxes and income taxes, the communities pay into a financial network that supports this construction. It is a complex structure that can have wide differences from state to state, however the multi-tiered approach to managing infrastructure is pretty nearly universal. This system will be, will have to be, employed in service of making the necessary repairs following the damage and stress the roads, bridges, levees and lands have sustained during this abnormal elemental spring.

Now is the time to put this forward. To make the case for the reality, rather than the dream. As debates about how much to cut from discretionary spending in state and federal budgets rage on, the need for real solutions is being exposed by receding waters and fire scorched earth. Now is the time to make the strong case for our existing system and the parts of that system that counter the anti-elitism rhetoric, that counter the private market will sort everything out rhetoric, the idea that government spending does not create jobs rhetoric. Now is the time to pick up the ball and advance the potential of a truly civilized United States a little further down the field.

Posted July 3, 2011

The Sublime Actions of the United States - A Rational Argument for Civilizing the United States

Watching and hearing the news of the killing of Osama Bin Laden this past week has been heartening and chilling.  Just as, after 9/11, I watched the bloodthirst swell in our nation, I predicted on 9/12 when the first signs of shock wearing off turned to a desire for vengeance that we would be in a war with another country within 18 months, the images that are making it to Finland of the young people chanting in the streets, holding U.S. flags and shouting "We're number 1" have chilled me to the bone. 

As a nation, we have been stunned and angered by the images of the youth of other cultures celebrating when they have successfully carried out a terrorist attack.  We find their celebration of the death of our leaders and our military to be cruel and unjust.  We think this because we reside in the U.S.A.

I can't say this any better than this journalist already did.

 

Celebrating death: Isn't that what terrorists do?


http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=219053

 

 

Posted May 7, 2011

Rational Arguments for Civilizing the United States

I've spent the majority of the past week walking in Helsinki, Finland and talking with my companion and people I pass on the streets.  Yesterday, I was carrying all of the plastic bottles, that had held the water or other beverages we had drunk, in my purse.  There were recycling containers everywhere and I could have deposited this collection in a repository on nearly any street corner but I knew something important that made it worth carrying these clunky things around a while longer.  In markets, you can return your bottles for cash.  The constant reminder of the sound of empty plastic bottles moving around in my bag and making retrieving anything else from my bag a challenge sparked an intense conversation with my walking companion.  Why don't we do this in more places in the U.S.?

We walked and talked about all of the processes associated with "green" living in the U.S.  Many have either been in place for decades and have been modified to accomodate the larger bulk of recyclable products that has accompanied the growing social awareness of waste and resource management while others are new and slow to catch on.  In the 70's aluminum could be returned or sold to scrap yards for cash.  We also paid a deposit for glass soda bottles and got cash back for returning them to the store.  Why have we moved away from this deposit and return system?  I often read the sides of bottles or cans in U.S. that tell me that in certain states, I can return this can for a 5 cent or 10 cent deposit.  It is never in my state...  There was a Seinfeld episode about Cramer collecting cans and then driving them to one of the states that offered deposit refunds.  As a society, many of us are aware that a system like this could exist, and even understand it well enough to parody the system in our popular culture.  However, in Finland, I got a .20, .30 or .40 euro return for each of my bottles (roughly 30 to 65 cents U.S.)  This helped me to understand the homeless people travelling around the bus and train terminals searching in trash cans for bottles and cans.  With just 10 of these bottles, they could easily afford a meal.  If I returned the bottles I was carrying in my overstuffed purse, I could pay for another beverage to take with me on the bus and a snack.

It was decided as we talked that the most important thing to do at this point in the U.S. is to make completely rational arguments and stick to them.  The anti-intellectualism that is dominant in the spectacle news and therefore in the forefront of American thinking at this period of our history can only be combatted with a strong argument devoid of reference to God or science.  We decided we must make arguments using simple math.

Finland is infinitely more civilized with respect to recycling than the U.S.

If you purchase bottles or cans, a depost is already paid in the price - this offers incentive to bring it back to get your deposit back.

If you want your deposit, you must do the work.  No service workers have to drive to your house to get the cans and bottles, you carry them to a central location, decreasing the need for large refuse trucks in urban centers.

If you do not want your deposit back and you throw out your bottles and cans, others in the society are active in attempting to get them to the recycle center to get your unreturned deposit.  (I have picked up discarded cans and bottles to return when I'm walking in Tampere or Helsinki).

The basic reward system promotes a reasonable management of this resource.  The only person who loses in this scenario is the person who paid the deposit but doesn't want to take the bottles or cans back to the store.  Other people will gladly do it.  It's like picking up change you find on the street.  The deposit is enough to make it worth your time to detour to a market to return them.  This system is more civilized because at every point in the process, it accomplishes its goals.  It makes the individual responsible, decreases waste and returns needed resources to the companies that use these materials for packaging.  Win, win, win and win.

Posted May 7, 2011

Medicare Makeover + Affordable Care Act repeal = No options for Seniors

1+1=0.
If the Affordable Care Act is repealed then the requirement to cover people with pre-existing conditions ends
+ If the Ryan Budget Proposal passes, Medicare becomes a voucher system for payment to private insurers
= Seniors with Pre-existing conditions can be denied any coverage by private insurers despite having their $15,000 vouchers.
It's simple math.

It's time to start asking questions

I am an artist living at a residency in Finland for 3 months.  Yesterday, I injured myself while chopping wood.  I had to go to the hospital to get stitches.  I went to a communal hospital that doesn't have a mechanism for charging their clients, so despite having and offering my U.S. health insurance foreign emergency coverage as a means of paying for my services, they were unable to process a charge for any patient including me.  Admission to the hospital was a one page document requiring my name, date of birth, address in Finland, a local emergency contact and a brief medical history, including allergies to medications they may use to treat me.  Though the nurse and doctor didn't speak very fluent English, my basic knowledge of Finnish and their solid understanding of basic English allowed us to have a quick and comfortable conversation about how to proceed with the stitches and what I needed to know about my aftercare.  I was out of the hospital within 45 minutes with additional dressings for my wound to take home with me.  This hospital was in a community of maybe 500 people in rural Western Finland.  There are no shootings, stabbings or interpersonal injuries that aren't accidents.  The nurse told me that most of the injuries in April are related to chopping wood.  Most of the injuries in May are related to lawnmower repair and most of the injuries in June are related to fishing hooks.  The Finns go to regular doctors for preventative care, not the hospital, and they pay a small co-pay for each of the first 3 visits of the year and then they don't have to pay anymore for any visits the rest of the year.

This was my first contact with socialized medicine, except for my experience with my senior parents who use medicare for their healthcare.  My experiences with U.S. and Finnish socialized medicine have reinforced my belief that now is the time to be asking very important questions about the direction of our country.  I am pleased to see in the U.S. news that I read each day that there are seniors going to townhall meetings to challenge their elected U.S. representatives on their vote for the Ryan Budget Proposal.  More questions must be asked.  My brief trip to the emergency room would have cost me more than US$1000 if I didn't have insurance and I'd had the same accident at my home in DC metro area.  Even with insurance, if I had a high deductible for my emergency policy, it STILL may have cost me more than $1000 since this was the first emergency I'd had in many years and I haven't been paying into my deductible.

It is very important to be asking questions of the supporters of the Ryan Budget Plan, because the plan intends to remake Medicare and cause seniors to compete in hostile private markets for a proposed $15,000 voucher that wouldn't come close to covering premium costs, let alone deductibles or overages in lifetime costs.  Without a repair to provide the guarantee that people can not be denied coverage for pre-existing conditions, many seniors would simply be denied coverage.  Let us not forget that while attempting to make Medicare into a voucher program, the State Attorneys General of Virginia, Michigan and other states are challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (derisively referred to as "Obamacare").  ACA being the only law in the land that DOES prevent exclusion of individuals from medical coverage due to pre-existing conditions.

It's time to start asking very difficult questions of the Elected officials, Democrats and Republicans.  However, it's time to start asking even harder questions of the most vulnerable among us in these proposed changes being passed through the House of Representatives by conservatives - we MUST start asking questions of the conservative voters who are voting against their own interests.  It is Republicans who supported the candidates currently holding Townhall meetings that are asking these difficult questions about what the Medicare Make-over will mean for them and their children.  This is encouraging because they are beginning to see how the Conservatives are voting against their own interests, they are beginning to see that the conservatives are not their candidates and will not represent their interests in Congress.  This is a crucial step toward a larger dialogue.  This is a step toward center and the possibility of bringing the conversation in this country a little closer to a reasonable centered balance, rather than being balanced by maximum extremes that have been in place for a few years now. 

I am watching this from a distance and feeling very safe that if I should have an accident while I'm living and working in Finland, this country is civilized enough that for lack of cash up front, I will not be left to die or forced into bankruptcy in exchange for a basic medical treatment.  It is time to start asking the most important question of all, is the U.S. civilized?  Does the U.S. want to be civilized?  Or is wreckless idealogy the only natural companion to the theory of The American Dream?

Pacific Gyre goes Radioactive?

This morning, I was checking the news. Though the stories of Japan's ongoing struggle to prevent complete meltdown at their nuclear power plants have stopped rising to the top stories in US media, the problem continues and frightening discoveries are being made. A month after the earthquake and tsunami that crippled the Fukushima Dai-ichi power plant, workers are still struggling to cool the stored fuel rods and to assess and manage the (possibly) melting down cores of the reactors. Major discharges of radioactive water have been flooding into the ocean through cracks in the reactor vessels. Pieces of fuel rods have been blown out of the reactors onto the soil surrounding the plant and many bulldozers are aggressively looking for these pieces of uranium and plutonium filled lumps. The bulldozers are covering what they can find with soil in the effort to prevent people who pass by from "being cooked" by their proximity to the extraordinarily dangerous materials. The workers aren't even capable of managing the situation well enough to gather and store these radioactive fuel rod pieces. All they can do is cover them to decrease contact with the radiation.

Media_http4bpblogspot_swedb

I am reminded of all of the highly radioactive emergency equipment parked at Prypiat Ukraine near the damaged Chernobyl reactor. Equipment that is still dangerously radioactive 25 years later and will be for 100's or 1000's of years into the future. I can already imagine the quarantined "hot zone" or exclusions zone boundaries. The maps that describe which areas are uninhabitable in Japan after this event has been stabilized. Like the maps of Belarus, Ukraine and the areas that are still, and will be for 100's or 1000's of years, places too dangerous for human presence. (Image of exclusion zone from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chernobyl_radiation_map_1996.svg)
The web page for Belarus government has radiation warnings and safety guidelines. Ukraine has begun to exploit the tragedy and to take radiation tourists into the zone. Perhaps thrill-seekers who want to feel the ominous presence of invisible death. Visitors are warned that if they step off of the pavement, the radiation levels spike to dangerous levels. An interesting industry, catastrophe tourism. However, the sites of civil war battles are also catastrophe tours, so perhaps it is nothing new.

What is or may be new is the effect of the

Media_http4bpblogspot_bbope
radiation on the Pacific Ocean. Only this morning did I begin to think more seriously about Ocean currents in the Pacific and was immediately reminded of the massive spiraling gyre of trash that sits between Japan and the US in the Pacific as a result of currents that pull water toward a center that is hard to escape. (Pacific Gyre image from: davideubank.wordpress.com) Massive radiation releases have poured into the pacific ocean at the Dai-ichi plant site through a crack in one of the reactor vessels. Workers were attempting to close the crack with concrete to prevent the tons of water being pumped into the towers to cool the stored fuel rods and the reactor cores from melting down even further from leaking directly into the ocean. However, that crack is an indication of the damage the buildings housing these nuclear materials sustained during the 9.0 earthquake and subsequent explosions and tremors have further corrupted the stability of those buildings. The concrete may hold, or it may be a finger in the dike attempting to hold back the weight of water building behind the wall. The power plant workers have no means of collecting and storing the highly radioactive water at this time. The water must do what it does and submit to gravity. The water will go somewhere.
The effect of all of this radiation may not be most strongly felt in North East Asia. The wind currents and ocean currents help to carry the radiation "out to sea". We have been reassured of this many times and this truth of Coriolis effect has been a comfort to the more than 160,000 people displaced and the rest of the Japanese and Korean populations waiting in agony for this crisis to begin to resolve.

Where will the radiation go once it is out to sea? Radiation levels in the Dai-ichi plant's immediate ocean contact zone have been 1000's of times higher than is considered safe. However within days, these numbers have dropped. The ocean has dispersed the material. Some will go to the ocean floor, some will go into the lowest levels of the food chain (plankton, etc) and be eaten by fish and whales), some will be carried by strong currents further into the ocean. After a natural temporal cycle that would bring the ocean currents through the Pacific Rim and return to the sprialing center that is the Pacific Gyre, will we see extremely high levels of radiation in this dead current zone? Will the new maps of exclusion zones include this area 2 times the size of Texas, once famous only for its spiraling plastic goo, that may now be a spiraling mass of radioactive plastic goo?

I'm not an oceanographer, a nuclear scientist or a marine biologist. I'm also not a conspiracy theorist. I can't help but wonder about the long-term effects of this crisis. If we look down the road, so to speak, we will see the spinning currents of the Pacific Rim tend to draw all things toward their center. I would like to know more about this possibility. I will research dispersal of nuclear material in oceans further.
If you have information or thoughts, I hope you will share them.

Filed under  //   currents   daiichi   fukushima   hodgin Jones   japan   karinhodginjones   pacific gyre   pacific ocean   radiation   radioactive  
Posted April 7, 2011